|
Total Loss
System - No Alternator
Ural
750 cc Engines

|
For pictures, see http://www.gummiente.ca/Bikes/Ural/total_loss_elect/index.htm |
|
Going "Commando"
- No Alternator, No problem!
The
Decision
After over 48,000km of listening to shrieking alternator
couplings and replacing more of them than I care to
remember, I was at my wit's end and desperate for a solution
to the problem. For reasons that have yet to be determined,
my '05 Tourist hates alternator couplings and it
seems that nothing short of a major redesign of this
component is going to change its mind. My own opinion is
that the location of the alternator is part of the problem;
tucked in behind the timing gear tower it is kept out of the
cooling airflow at highway speeds and very susceptible to
heat from the motor. This heat eventually causes the
grease in the two coupling bearings to liquefy and flow out
through the shields, causing them to seize up. This problem
is not helped in my case with my insistence on running the
large metal leg shields, which further reduce the chances of
cooling airflow from reaching the alternator assembly. But
the tradeoff here is that the leg shields actually deflect
more air onto the cylinder heads, helping keep them cooler
in hot weather. So I stoically put up with increasingly
loud, shrill bearings and frequent coupling change outs
until finally finding a solution in the form of a conversion
to a total loss electrical system.
I had
first heard about this concept on the IMZ Web Board and on
the Russian Iron forum a while back, so I did a search on
those sites to find out all I could about the process. It
seemed that this conversion was done on a lot of pre-'04
Urals because of the poor reliability of the Russian made
alternator, but there were a couple of late model owners
that had also done the surgery. However, detailed
information such as battery ratings, wiring procedures and
such were scarce so I had to do a lot of research on my own
to come up with a plan. I also took a look at my riding
habits and realized that the majority of my runs were within
the 3hr range, with the occasional longer trip to a rally or
other event. As it would be impractical to carry a battery
charger with me on the longer trips, I decided to make the
conversion so that the alternator could be plugged back in
if required. That way I'd have all the bases covered,
including the possibility of an improved coupling design
should that Holy Grail ever appear.
The
Research
On normal bikes, the electrical supply system consists of a
battery that stores and provides all the required power, as
well as an alternator to keep it topped up and step in as
required when demand exceeds the battery's supply. A "total
loss" system, however, is one that runs on battery power
alone and requires the use of an external battery charger to
replenish the battery when it is not in use. Because an
alternator can supply extra power when needed, the physical
size of the Ural's OEM battery can be kept relatively small.
But a small battery means a short supply of electrical power
if the alternator were to cease output, so simply removing
the alternator isn't enough to effect a change to a total
loss system - a larger battery must be installed to ensure
longer operation in between charging cycles.
There
are two types of larger batteries, but really only one of
them is suitable for total loss system use. A car battery is
obviously larger than the Ural's OEM battery and can provide
power for several hours before the voltage falls below
useable limits, but the problem is it is designed for use
with an alternator that constantly keeps it topped up.
Constant discharge/charge cycles in a total loss application
will greatly reduce the life of the battery because it is
not designed for this type of abuse. But the other type of
battery is - a "deep cycle" battery is designed specifically
for applications that rely on battery power alone, like an
electric trolling motor for a fishing boat or the DC power
system in an RV motor home. These batteries are built to
handle repeated total discharge/charge cycles, aka "deep
cycles", so that is why I decided to use one for my total
loss system.
Before I did that, I had to figure out what size and rating
of a battery I'd need for my situation and that meant
figuring out how much power draw the Ural would require
in normal and a "worst case" scenarios, then matching that
to a suitable battery. I did this by figuring out the
current draw of all the components for both cases... |
|
|
Normal running
conditions
55W - sealed beam Halogen (low beam)
78W - three 1156 running lights
6W - two 3W dash lights
18W - ignition system
157W = 13A Total
194W = 16A Total with electric vest |
Full load
conditions
65W - sealed beam Halogen (high beam)
56W - two 1157 brake lights
78W - three 1156 running lights
26W - two 1156 signal lights
6W - two 3W dash lights
37W - electric vest
18W - ignition system
286W = 24A Total |
|
|
|
|
Note
that I did not include the current draw of the electric
starter - more on that in a bit. Once I had these numbers,
the next step was to figure out which deep cycle marine
battery was capable of producing enough reserve power to
handle the full load conditions as long as possible. This is
where the research got a bit tricky, because there are
several methods by which batteries are rated. For example,
Amp Hours is a measure of how much power a battery can
supply and maintain for a set time period before dropping
below its rated voltage. Cold Cranking Amps is a measure of
how much current a battery can supply for a 30 second period
at -18C. Reserve Capacity Minutes is a measure of how long a
battery can provide a steady 25a supply at 27C before
dropping below 10.5 Volts. The Amp Hour method used to be
the standard means of rating in North America, but because
the testing conditions varied widely from manufacturer to
manufacturer, it eventually was replaced by the Cold
Cranking Amps and Reserve Capacity Minutes methods. Armed
with that knowledge, I looked at several batteries and
settled on a marine deep cycle with a Reserve Capacity
Minutes rating of 120. In other words, under full load
conditions this battery would power the Ural for two hours
before dropping below 10.5 Volts.
Realistically, though, the time frame would be longer
because I would not be sitting for two hours with the brake
lights, the signal lights on and the headlight on high beam,
so the current draw would be less than 20A. Also, I
could shut off the headlight and electric vest if I noticed
the power beginning to fade, giving a bit more time to get
home. Under normal operating conditions I estimated around
5-6 hours of useable battery power before having to shut off
the headlight and electric vest and probably 6-8 hours
before the ignition would cease to operate. The Ural's
ignition system will function down to around 7 Volts, by the
way.
So...
given that the majority of my rides are within the 3 hour
range, a battery with a 120 Reserve Capacity Minutes rating
would do just fine for my requirements. The only unknown was
the electric starter - I have yet to determine its exact
cranking amperage and even if I do it will be hard to
determine just how much it will deplete the battery when
used. So I resolved to use the kick start as much as
possible and keep an eye on the battery condition with the
use of a digital voltmeter and eventually learn the
time/power limits through experience.
Once I
had the desired rating in mind, finding the actual battery
was easy. NAPA Auto Parts coughed up this beauty for $155.
It is a maintenance free sealed Deep Cycle Marine unit rated
at 120 Reserve Minutes that weighs in at 37lb.
Canadian
Tire had a plastic marine battery box that was a little
bigger than the battery itself for $16. NAPA and CT provided
the rest of the electrical parts (battery cables, toggle
switches, fusebox, etc) while the local Home Hardware had
the angle iron and fasteners needed to build the battery box
platform. |
|
|
|
Once I
had all the components, I began the conversion process. The
first step was to determine the best location for the large,
heavy deep cycle battery. There are really only two options
here, one being to mount it in the trunk of the sidecar and
the other to mount it on the sidecar frame in the area
of the foot peg for the bike's passenger.
Mounting
it in the trunk of the sidecar requires the battery cables
to run out through a hole over to the bike. The downsides to
this are that because the rear of the sidecar flexes
on rubber encased springs, the battery cables would be
subjected to a lot of movement. This means that special care
needed to be taken when routing them through the sidecar
body as well as the requirement for frequent checks to
ensure the connections are tight at both ends. Also, there
is a huge loss of space inside the trunk area with this
setup, along with the requirement to reinforce the floor in
order to handle the 37lb battery. The up side to having the
battery mounted in the sidecar is that the battery is
protected from the elements.
Mounting the battery on the sidecar frame means that foot
room for the rear passenger is eliminated. The battery is
also more susceptible to the elements and requires a more
robust mounting system to prevent it from falling off. The
upsides are the heavy battery is placed lower on the center
of gravity, there is no loss of space in the sidecar trunk,
the battery cables are much shorter and they will not be
subjected to flexing once installed. Based on my reluctance
to lose luggage space and the fact that I removed the rear
passenger seat a long time ago, I chose to mount the battery
on the sidecar frame.
The
Wiring Conversion
First step was to remove the OEM battery. Others who have
done the total loss conversion have kept it in place and
isolated it from the new battery by means of a switch, so
that if the main battery is depleted the OEM can be used as
a backup. However, this creates additional headaches with
regards to wiring and in my opinion a "backup" battery isn't
much use if it is only 1/4 the capacity of the main one.
Proper trip planning would prevent me from being stranded
with a dead battery. But I left the battery mounting plate
in place anyway, just in case some day I decide to switch
back to a normal alternator system.
The
alternator was next. The two wires on the top terminal were
removed, then fastened together with a small bolt, taped up
with red electrical tape for easy identification and stashed
into a secure spot underneath the gas tank. These wires must
be kept together or power will not be delivered to the rest
of the bike's electrical system.
The small red wire with a spade terminal that plugs into the
rear of the alternator is what turns the fault light on or
off on the dash. The light is lit when the motor is off,
then extinguished once it is started and the alternator is
turning. With the alternator removed this meant that the
dash light would always be lit, as it would not receive the
signal to extinguish. So the red wire was also taped with
red electrical tape and stashed under the gas tank, while
the bulb for the dash light was simply removed. No bulb, no
problem.
The
small green wire with the spade terminal at the rear of the
alternator is the one that controls the relays for the
electric start. With the ignition on, but the motor not
running, this wire provides a path to ground that allows the
starter relays to be energized. When the starter button is
pressed, the power is delivered to the starter and once the
motor starts and the alternator is turning, the ground is
disconnected internally. This cuts the power to the relays,
which means the starter will not engage if you accidentally
thumb the button while the motor is running. As I was
reluctant to lose the convenience of the electric start
feature, I figured out a way to retain its function without
the alternator. All I had to do was run a wire from
ground to a toggle switch and then attach the green wire to
the other terminal of the switch. With the ignition on, the
toggle switch is flicked to allow a path to ground. Then the
start button is pressed and once the motor is running, the
toggle switch is flicked off and the path to ground is
removed so that the starter relays cannot remain energized.
As I
knew the rough location of where the battery box was to be
mounted, I measured the distance from there to the starter
solenoid terminal and the right side airbox mounting stud.
The positive cable would be attached to the solenoid, as it
is the same electrical location as the positive cable on the
OEM battery and the negative cable with its larger terminal
needed a larger mounting point. NAPA had several cables
available in different lengths, so I chose two that were
closest to the measurements I needed. Unlike '06 and up
models, my '05 does not have a power outlet and fusebox in
the sidecar. I have a sidecar mounted spotlight and a 12V
power outlet that I installed, so I mounted a covered
fusebox on a home made metal mounting tab underneath the
driver's seat in the OEM battery area and attached the
starter relays to it.
|
|
Mounting
The Battery |
|
I don't
have access to a welder, so I made a frame from angle iron
that was slightly larger than the base of the battery,
bolting it all together. A muffler clamp secures one front
corner to the sidecar frame tube and the passenger foot peg
was removed and the mount rotated to secure the other front
corner. One rear corner had nothing in its vicinity to bolt
up to, so a standoff was made near it by using a small bolt
that rests on the frame cross member and allows the frame to
remain level. The other rear corner was attached to the bike
via a length of angle iron bolted to the rear grab rail.
With three solid mount points and the standoff, it was very
secure and able to support the heavy battery. |
|
A piece
of 1/2' plywood was cut to fit the bottom of the tray, with
a cutout for the muffler clamp bolt. This ensured the
battery box had a solid surface to sit on, as well as
keeping it from contacting any of the frame hardware. The
angle iron was tall enough to allow for a lip edge to help
retain the battery box in position. |
|
The
battery box was screwed onto the wood base. With the lid in
place, it slotted neatly into its spot like it had been
designed that way. There was sufficient clearance from the
shock tower, gas can and sidecar body so that nothing would
disturb it. |
|
Once all
the sharp edges were cleaned up, everything was painted and
the securing straps for the lid placed in position. The
cross strap passes underneath the tray, while the long strap
passes underneath the frame cross member to help secure the
entire unit to the frame. |
|
The
finished assembly looked good and was very securely mounted.
In this photo you can clearly see why there is no foot room
for a passenger on the bike.
|
Cables and
Wiring
|
|
The
vented battery box has openings to allow the cables to exit
at almost any location. The lid overhangs the top of the box
by about 1.5", so there is protection against water, mud and
snow from splashing into the box. The battery cables were
routed into the bike and secured together with zip ties. |
|
As
mentioned previously, the negative cable is fastened to the
airbox mount stud and the positive cable to the starter
solenoid terminal. The other positive circuit wires were
attached in their original location on the solenoid
terminal, too, including a power wire that goes to the new
fusebox. |
|
The new
fusebox was mounted under the seat, with the starter relays
secured to the back of the mounting plate. All the accessory
wiring was attached, with each spade terminal getting a coat
of dielectric grease to help prevent corrosion. |
|
An
alternator hole cover plate was made from a piece of heat
resistant plastic I had lying around and an old inner tube
was cut to make a gasket for it. Angle iron was used to
provide a mounting point for the Gummi's Airbox on the right
and the Fiamm horn on the left. This setup allows for the
alternator to be plugged back in at any time without having
to rework any of these mounting points. |
|
A
headlight cutout switch was mounted on the side of the dash.
The ground wire at the headlight bucket is where it hooks up
to. If the battery voltage drops too low, the headlight is
switched off to conserve power. Another toggle switch was
installed on the other side of the dash to power the
sidecar-mounted spotlight. |
|
The
toggle switch for the electric start was mounted in an
existing hole on the seat plate. If the Ural ever stalls in
traffic, it is within easy reach to activate and the bike
can be fired up a lot quicker than by dismounting to use the
kickstarter. |
|
The
"Commando" Electrical Conversion in all its glory. It looks
a little freaky with all the open space under the gas tank,
but you really don't notice it unless you're crawling along
the ground on hands and knees... and if you are,
you're probably too drunk to notice this, anyway. |
|
The Results
Initial tests of the new system went very well and it wasn't
long before I had logged over 400km, trouble free. A pigtail
connector was added as an afterthought, exiting the rear of
the battery box, to allow a battery charger to be hooked
up without having to remove the lid as well as providing an
alternate power point for such luxuries as a small 12V
cooler or a heated vest for the sidecar passenger. I
estimate the useable range of the system under normal
conditions to last about 5-6hrs between charges, but so far
have only made trips of less than 2hrs duration due to
winter weather setting in. Eventually I plan to install LED
bulbs for all the signal lights to further reduce the power
consumption. Total cost for the conversion including paint,
hardware, angle iron and the various electrical bits, rings
in at around the $250CDN mark. But when compared to the cost
of rebuilding an alternator coupling every few months and
the blessed peace and quiet that comes from puttering along
without a screeching alternator, really, the value is
priceless. |
|
Mike “Gummiente” Palmer
Canadian Ural/Dnepr Riders Group (CURD) |
|